Share This

Google+ Badge

Friday, May 30, 2014

Parkinsons or Alzheimers

Jerry asked Earl, "At your ripe age, what do you prefer to get –
Parkinson's or Alzheimer's?"
The wise one answered, "Definitely Parkinson's.
Better to spill half an ounce of Jack Daniels, than to forget where you keep the bottle!"

Thursday, May 29, 2014

Guard Dog for a Muslim Women ----- They call it s Barka

Thanks to Bare Naked Islam for the Photo.

SDU: Salute to the European youth

"America" The Movie Preview: Dave Mustaine

It's Not the End of the World, but it's the End of the Party

Central African Republic: Islamic jihadists storm church, murder at least 30

Jihad Watch
May 29 2014


The mainstream media has portrayed the violence in the Central African Republic as emanating solely from the Christians, generally without noting that they were reacting to initial persecution from the Muslims. No violence against innocent people is ever justified; the mainstream media only notices such violence in the Central African Republic when Christians are the perpetrators.
“At least 30 killed in Muslim raid on Central African Republic church,” Associated Press, May 28, 2014 (thanks to Kenneth):
BANGUI, Central African Republic — A priest in Central African Republic says at least 30 people have been killed after suspected Muslim rebels attacked a church where Christians were seeking refuge.
The Rev. Paul Emile Nzale told The Associated Press that the gunfire and grenade attack took place Wednesday afternoon in a displacement camp at the Church of Fatima in Bangui, the capital.
An Associated Press reporter counted at least 20 bodies taken to a hospital in the city because the morgue was not in service.
Wednesday’s attack is the largest in Bangui blamed on Muslim rebels since their Seleka coalition left power in January.
Most of the sectarian violence since then has been Christian militia fighters targeting Muslims, and there were already fears that Wednesday’s attack could prompt deadly reprisals.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/ 

BBC Newsday Report on the stoning of Farzana Parveen in Pakistan

Monday, May 26, 2014

Fifty Thousand Names Carved In The Wall ~ George Jones



George Jones has a way of bringing a tear to your eyes. 

The Eagle Cried ~ Vietnam Veterans Tribute




Warrior Song Armed Forces Tribute

Thank You For Your Service (A Moment of Truth)


A Dying Mans Last Will

 Doug Smith is on his deathbed and knows the end is near. 

His nurse, his wife, his daughter and two sons are with him.
 
 So, he says to them: 

 "Bernie, I want you to take the Mayfair houses."
 
 "Sybil, you take the apartments over in the east end."
 
 "Jamie, I want you to take the offices over in the City Centre."

 "Sarah, my dear wife, please take all the residential buildings on the banks of the river."

The nurse is just blown away by all this, and as Doug slips away, she says, 
"Mrs. Smith, your husband must
 have been such a hard-working man to have accumulated all this property". 

 Sarah replies, "Property? .... the asshole had a paper route!"

Pahrumpump

Justice to count feds' guns

The Hill
The Justice Department is updating a report on how many guns the federal government has.
It will be the first time Justice has addressed the topic in six years, and it comes as conservative and libertarian complaints about an excessively gun-happy government have intensified.
The issue was central to the recent controversy generated by a stand-off between right-wing rancher Cliven Bundy and agents from the Bureau of Land Management in Nevada.
Bundy and his supporters argued an armed federal government threatened too much force in a dispute over grazing and public lands. But critics of Bundy worry that the decision by federal and local officials to back off in response to armed resistance by Bundy and his supporters could embolden self-styled militia groups.
The Justice Department’s Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) will undertake this year’s report. It will begin surveying federal agencies about how many of their agents carry guns and have the authority to make arrests in July, according to the author of the 2008 version Brian Reaves.
It is not clear when the data will be finalized, though the final release could take until early 2015.
Six years ago, the Justice Department found that 73 government agencies employed about 120,000 armed agents.
The 2008 report found that four out of five armed federal agents belonged to branches of the Justice Department or the Department of Homeland Security, but the other 20 percent were spread out among dozens of agencies that are not as well known for their law enforcement activities.
Not only is the FBI armed. So too are members of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), U.S. Postal Service (USPS), Railroad Retirement Board, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), according to the report.
Until recently, even the Library of Congress employed an armed unit.
From 2004 to 2008, the government added about 15,000 armed agents, the earlier Justice report found. During that time period, an additional eight agencies began employing armed units.
That’s angered libertarian groups who question the need for some of those agencies to be armed. They argue the government is increasingly arming itself.
“Hey, if you don’t bring that book back, we’re coming for you,” joked Larry Pratt, executive director of the conservative Gun Owners of America.
Earlier this month, the office of inspector general for the U.S. Department of Agriculture said it would be acquiring submachine guns.
That prompted Bob Owens to write on the Bearing Arms website that it was “part of a trend to arm every branch of federal government, whether the individual agency has a legitimate need for a paramilitary force or not.”
Rep. Jim Bridenstine (R-Okla.) in a May 21 letter wrote USDA expressing concern about the purchase, and asking for more information. He said he was worried USDA was straying from its mission.
USDA has said that officers with the USDA Office of Inspector General after often armed as they are investigating crimes including fraud, smuggling and theft of government property.
Interesting that finally someone wants to know just what the federal government wants with so guns and ammunition. For example we recently caught this requisition by the Agriculture Department.
Department of Agriculture requisitions submachine guns
Does the Agriculture Department really need 40 caliber machine guns with 30 round magazines?

Homeland Security under investigation for massive ammo buys

FEMA COFFINS and CROWD CONTROL

I look for patterns and changes that might indicate an event is about to happen.  I have two stories which have just happened that indicate the government is getting ready for some massive uprising and is going to need to deal with the outcomes and plan on how to control the situations.  I recently posted the information about the massive dehydrated food purchases by the government which of course indicates crisis food and having enough to eat for their goons and locked up population.  I also posted the news about the various branches of the government buying a billion rounds of hollow point ammunition.  Now, we have these two stories and it seems to me they are planning on lots of dead bodies to deal with and crowd control:


  

Why Does the Government Need Guillotines?


This crazy, WTF is the Obama regime planning? Why has he removed top military men and replaced them with those who are willing to kill Americans?Of Course with Eric Holder leading the justice department, we know nothing will come of this investigation, just as nothing has come of Fast and Furious, IRS, NSA, Benghazi and now the VA scandal. 

Sunday, May 25, 2014

Ouija Boards: Spiritualism and Manipulation -- Stuff They Don't Want You To Know

The Financial Armageddon

What do Ouija boards actually do? Have some games really predicted the future? Tune in to learn more about conspiracy theories in the world of gaming.


Rolling Thunder 2014

From The Jawa Report






Corsi - Tea Party Demands Impeachment

TeaParty.org
(Dr. Jerome Corsi) – Here it comes all over again.
Amnesty.
Believe it or not, the Obama administration plans to make a final push for amnesty under the guise of passing “comprehensive immigration reform.”
Let’s not be fooled by yet more lying Barack Obama rhetoric.
What this is all about for the Democrats is gaining votes by fueling Obama’s massive and growing federal social welfare system.
Unfortunately, Tea Party Loyalists and the U.S. Constitution are the big losers as the Democrats invite illegal immigrants to dilute the votes of U.S. citizens while demanding we pay the bill as taxpayers who still have jobs.
Look at the cold, hard statistics.
Democratic Party election strategists expect 75 percent of Hispanics to vote Democratic.
So, simple mathematics pushes political operatives like Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to open the borders as wide as possible in hopes amnesty will become a fait accompli and all immigrants, illegal as well as legal, will be given full voting rights in the United States.
The Democrats also know a tidal wave of Hispanic immigration will mean for the foreseeable future a boon to the type of government funded social welfare programs the Democrats love.
  
Count out the taxpayer money Barack Obama intends to redistribute to illegal immigrants allowed to flood the country once Congress has voted a truly open border with Mexico:
  • Free education in public schools in Spanish;
  • Abundant welfare payments including food stamps issued generously to all Hispanics regardless of immigration status;
  • DREAM act privileges for Hispanics to get special college admission tuition breaks;
  • Obamacare plus endless free medical care at Hospital emergency rooms.
The list goes on.
To push this agenda forward, Attorney General Eric Holder has followed President Obama’s instructions to stop deportations of illegal immigrants as part of a grander policy of refusing to enforce immigration laws altogether.
This selective enforcement of U.S. laws represents a dereliction of duty that Tea Party Loyalists believe should result in the impeachment of Barack Obama and Eric Holder.
Yet, Democratic Party immigration activists like Rep. Luis Gutierrez continue to flaunt the law openly, suggesting that until Congress passes sweeping amnesty legislation, “every institution in America” should find ways to ignore or work around federal immigration laws.
But it’s not just the Democrats.
Unfortunately, establishment Republicans in Congress have followed behind House Speaker John Boehner in his suggestion we need to pass some form of amnesty because, as Boehner claims, “We are a nation of immigrants and this issue has become a political football.”
Tea Party Loyalists openly accept legal immigration.
What Tea Party Loyalists want is border security first.
We were shocked earlier this month when Immigrations and Customs Enforcement released over 36,000 illegal immigrants from detention centers throughout the United States, even though these 36,000 aliens had been convicted in the U.S. of over 88,000 crimes, including murder, grand larceny, kidnapping, and sexual crimes including rape.
The House Judiciary Committee documented this month that criminal illegal aliens released by the Obama administration between 2009 and 2011 were subsequently charged with committing 19 murders after being released, 3 murders, and 142 sex crimes.
Even if Tea Party Loyalists manage to block amnesty legislation from passing Congress, we have to remain concerned President Obama will simply enact amnesty, as he has threatened to do, by a swipe of the pen signing executive orders.
Last week, Harry Reid threatened that if the House does not move forward on immigration reform by this summer, President Obama will have no alternative but to “act alone” to stop deportations.
That is more than a promise from the Democratic Party, it is an openly expressed threat that unless Congress gives President Obama the amnesty bill the Democratic Party wants, President Obama will ignore the Constitution once again by issuing as many orders as it takes to vitiate immigration laws duly passed by Congress and signed into law by previous presidents.
TeaParty.org has sent millions of Fax Blasts to Congress in the past months.
We need to do it again.
Please join me in sending to Congress a TeaParty.org Fax Blast that says  “No to Amnesty!”
We have had enough of the lies Obama is willing to tell in his move to grab power and deny U.S. citizens our fundamental freedoms.
Tea Party Loyalists are the last line of resistance to “America’s Fraud President” who is attempting to deprive us of our Constitutional rights in his effort to debase America to a police-state maintaining order in a second-class nation.
Our voices must and will be heard.
We Will Not Sit Down!
We Will Not Shut Up!
We are putting out a call: Tea Party Loyalists are warning Americans to wake up to America’s fraudulent and imperial president.
Washington needs to know that Tea Party Loyalists intend to win at the ballot box in November 2014, and again in November 2016, defeating any and all incumbent members of Congress – Republicans and Democrats alike – who do not stand with us to defend our borders.
Tea Party Loyalists must let Congress know that we are serious and that we intend to push for impeachment if Barack Obama and Eric Holder continue flaunting the due enforcement of our immigration laws in their politically motivated push for amnesty.
Corsi136BDr. Jerome Corsi
Dr. Jerome Corsi received a Ph.D. from Harvard University in Political Science in 1972. He is the author of two No. 1 New York Times nonfiction bestsellers, “Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry” (with co-author John O’Neill) and “The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality.” In the past 5 years, Dr. Corsi has written 5 New York Times Bestselling non-fiction books. Dr. Corsi is the Senior Commentator for TeaParty.org.
- See more at: http://www.teaparty.org/corsi-tea-party-demands-impeachment-immigration-laws-enforced-42720/#sthash.dFsrp4iF.dpuf

The Investigative Project on Terrorism - Proving Our Point

Robert Spencer in Truth Revolt: Keith Ellison’s Rogues Gallery

Jihad Watch
May 25, 2014

In Truth Revolt today I discuss some associations of Keith Ellison of a kind that would have gotten any non-Muslim Congressman under media fire, with calls for his resignation.
Representatives Keith Ellison (D-MN) and André Carson (D-IN), the nation’s two Muslim Congressmen, and a host of Muslim leaders have published an open letter condemning Boko Haram, the Party of the People of the Sunnah for Dawah and Jihad, as un-Islamic, and calling upon the group’s leader, Abubakar Shekau, to release the girls the group has kidnapped.
The U.S. Muslims’ argument is based on the claim that Boko Haram kidnapped the girls because they were seeking an education, while in Islam both men and women are enjoined to get educated. This neatly avoids the real objection that Boko Haram has to girls (and boys) getting educated: that the education they were getting was Western in style and orientation, rather than based on the Qur’an and Islam.
Once again we see Muslim leaders condemning the kidnapping of these girls without even mentioning the Qur’an’s allowance for a man to have “captives of the right hand” with whom he can have sexual intercourse (4:3; 4:24; 33:50. etc.). It would be refreshing if even once these “moderate” Muslim leaders would address these passages and explain how Boko Haram and other Muslims who kidnap girls and use them as sex slaves are misunderstanding and misusing the Qur’an. But it hasn’t been done yet.
Also noteworthy is the company that Ellison and Carson are keeping. Following their names are those of thirty Muslim leaders in the U.S., many with statements and associations on record that normally would give any Congressman pause before he allowed their names to be associated with his. Indeed, the rogue’s gallery joining Ellison and Carson in signing this letter would be enough to topple any politician in other circumstances – but when it comes to Leftist politicians and Muslim leaders with unsavory ties, the rules that apply to conservatives fall by the wayside.
Topping the list is the Imam Mohamed Magid of the ADAMS Center in Sterling, Virginia. Magid is the president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), which has admitted ties to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood. ISNA was also named an unindicted co-conspirator in the trial of the Holy Land Foundation, which was once the largest Islamic charity in the U.S. and was then shut down for funneling money to Hamas.
Next is Oussama Jamal, who, according to Investor’s Business Daily, “once headed the notorious Bridgeview Mosque in Chicago. One of that mosque’s leaders was arrested and jailed for funneling millions to Hamas. And one of its most honored guests was bin Laden’s spiritual mentor, the late Palestinian cleric Abdullah Azzam….‘The walls were covered with Hamas posters and recruiting literature showing masked gunmen brandishing automatic weapons. . . . You could see daggers plunged into Jewish hearts wrapped up in American flags,’ said Steve Emerson, describing the mosque in his book ‘American Jihad.’ ‘They even had a library filled with terrorist videos.’”
Also signing from the Bridgeview Mosque were the Imams Jamal Said, an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land trial, and Kifah Mustapha, who was denied a police chaplaincy in 2010 because of his support for Hamas, including a video in which he sings: “O Hamas, teach us the rifle … O Hamas, raise the banner of Jihad.”
Mazen Mokhtar of the Muslim American Society is also a signer. The Muslim American Society is the Muslim Brotherhood’s chief operating arm in the U.S. A 2004 Chicago Tribune piece that is now carried on the Muslim Brotherhood’s English-language website, Ikhwanweb, states: “In recent years, the U.S. Brotherhood operated under the name Muslim American Society, according to documents and interviews. One of the nation’s major Islamic groups, it was incorporated in Illinois in 1993 after a contentious debate among Brotherhood members.”
Among the signers are at least two Muslim leaders who have expressed disdain for American Constitutional government. A convert to Islam, Sheikh Hamza Yusuf of Zaytuna College, said in 1996: “I became Muslim in part because I did not believe in the false gods of this society whether we call them Jesus or democracy or the Bill of Rights.”
And the Imam Suhaib Webb of the Islamic Society of Boston, who last November dismissed secularism as a “radical lunatic ideology.”
Then there is Hatem Bazian, a professor of “Islamophobia” at (where else?) the University of California Berkeley, who has equated the Boston jihad bombings with “Islamophobia” and, several years ago, called for an “intifada” in the U.S. A supporter of the bloody intifadas in Israel is Nihad Awad of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), another unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land trial.Awad has said: “I am a supporter of the Hamas movement.”
Shaykh Yasir Qadhi of the Al-Maghrib Institute in Memphis is recorded on video calling Jews and Christians filthy and saying that their lives and property can be taken in jihad by Muslims, quoting Muhammad’s statement: “I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah’s Apostle, and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity, so if they perform a that, then they save their lives and property from me except for Islamic laws and then their reckoning (accounts) will be done by Allah.” (Bukhari 1.2.24) So if they don’t become Muslim, their lives and property are not safe.
Opponents of the American system, unindicted co-conspirators, supporters of bloody uprising and religious warfare in the U.S., and of terror groups abroad – if the context of all this were anything but Islamic, the mainstream media would be in an uproar, and calls for the resignations of Ellison and Carson would fill the airwaves. As it is, this letter has passed unnoticed, except for plaudits to the Congressmen for their “moderation.” One wonders if any of these politicians’ unsavory associates ever laugh up their sleeves at this suicidal naivete.
 http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/05/robert-spencer-in-truth-revolt-keith-ellisons-rogues-gallery

Video: Kansas Sheriff Cancels Anti-Muslim Training Following Request by CAIR



Oh really, Not Obama and his CIA director John Brennan putting pressure on the Kansas Sheriff's department. Can't be or can it? We know for a fact that Obama has his nose deep up the Muslim brotherhoods ass. We know that Brennan is now a Muslim.  We saw how Obama supported the Muslim brotherhood when Morsi was elected president and how upset Obama got when the people got upset with what a Morsi as president ment to them. Obama has brotherhood members into the white house on a regular basis. CAIR has links to the brotherhood and Hamas. So yes its possible to believe Obama's thugs put pressure on the Kansas sheriffs department.

Saturday, May 24, 2014

Krauthammer's Take: Administration Using the Same 'Stonewall Playbook' from Past Scandals

Death Penalty, Whipping for Christian Woman in Sudan Consistent with Islamic Law

Morning Star News

In sentencing Meriam Ibrahim, Sudan is far from violating sharia.


(Morning Star News) – The sentence of 100 lashes and death by hanging that a Sudanese judge handed to Meriam Ibrahim are consistent with Islamic law, contrary to Islamic leaders and others who cite her case as an anomaly.
In a case that has drawn international condemnation since Morning Star News first broke the story, Ibrahim was sentenced to death for leaving Islam and 100 lashes for having sex with an “infidel,” as her husband is Christian. She has insisted she did not violate Islamic law as practiced in Sudan because she was raised by her Ethiopian Orthodox mother and never practiced Islam, her Muslim father having disappeared when she was 6 years old. Asserting she was never a Muslim, she denies being an apostate from Islam.
Her husband, Daniel Wani, was found innocent of proselytizing, but their marriage was deemed null and void on the grounds that it is illegal for a Muslim woman to marry a Christian man. Ibrahim, 27, was subsequently charged with “adultery” and sentenced to 100 lashes. When she countered the adultery charge by insisting that she was a Christian, the charge of apostasy was added, and on Feb. 17 the now pregnant Meriam was imprisoned in Omdurman Federal Women’s Prison along with her first-born son, Martin (now 20 months old).
According to the Koran, fitna – that is, anything that “averts people from the way of Allah,” anything that “causes disbelief” and therefore chaos – is to be regarded as the greatest of all evils. Fitna is worse than killing (i.e., killing is the lesser of the two evils) – and fitna must be purged (Sura 2:217). Be assured, nothing generates fitna like the presence of joyful, thriving apostates. Furthermore, apostasy is regarded as a betrayal of the Muslim nation akin to treason. According to Islam and sharia (Islamic law), the penalty for apostasy is death. This is backed up by the famous Hadith (saying of Muhammad): Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him” (Sahih Bukhari Vol. 9, book 84, number 57).
Concerning men, all schools of sharia (Islamic law) agree that an adult male convicted of apostasy must be killed (unless he is not of sound mind), and that boys convicted of apostasy must be imprisoned until they are of age and then, if they persist in their apostasy, they must be killed.
Concerning women, three of the four main Sunni schools of Islamic jurisprudence – the Hanbali, Maliki and Shafi’i schools – teach that women apostates must likewise be executed. Only the Hanafi (from Kufa, Sth Iraq) and Shia schools teach that women apostates should be imprisoned until they recant. (This is essentially because they view women as so insignificant that they are actually incapable of generating fitna, and therefore do not require elimination.
Sudanese Islamic jurisprudence follows the Shafi’i school.
Generally, scholars interpret Sura 4:137 as grounds for a Muslim having three chances or three days to repent/recant before forgiveness is denied.
For an excellent study on apostasy in Islam, see Political and Legal Status of Apostates in Islam
by Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain (December 2013).
Unlike Christianity, where religious identity is a matter of personal faith, in Islam, religious identity is a political matter, a matter for the Islamic state or nation.
In Islam, a child inherits their religion from their father and is registered as such from birth. Consequently, Muslim men are free to marry Christian women; in fact in some quarters, Muslim men are actually encouraged to marry Christians – sometimes they are even financially rewarded for marrying Christian women – for this not only removes child-bearers from the Christian community but also ensures the children of Christian women are deemed Muslim from birth.
Conversely, Islamic law bans Muslim women from marrying Christian men. Any Christian man who wants to marry a Muslim woman must first convert to Islam to ensure her children are born Muslim.
When a Muslim parent abandons Islam, they automatically lose custody of their children because it is imperative that the children be raised Muslim.
When a nominally Christian father converts to Islam in order to take a Muslim woman as a second wife, his Christian children are deemed and registered Muslim upon his conversion. From that point, his forcibly converted daughters are obliged by law to marry Muslim men and bear Muslim children, while his forcibly converted sons, even though free to marry Christian women, will produce Muslim children that must be raised as Muslims following Islam and Sharia.
Add to all this, the fact that Muslims are captives for whom leaving is forbidden upon penalty of death, and you have a truly brilliant  (albeit insidious) strategy for permanent exponential growth of the Muslim community; growth that is guaranteed not only at the expense of other religious communities, but even in the virtual absence of religious conversions.
Clearly, anyone who says the rulings in Khartoum violate sharia is either misinformed or is seeking to misinform.
Islam underpins not only these rulings out of Khartoum, but much Islamic violence, much Islamic repression and many thousands of honor killings committed annually along with the impunity afforded the perpetrators.
According to Islam and sharia (as distinct from individual Muslims), Meriam Ibrahim is a Muslim because she was born to a Muslim father. According to Islam and sharia, Daniel Wani should have converted to Islam before marrying her in 2012. Had Wani complied, submitting to sharia, then the marriage would have been legal, the children would be Muslim, and Muslims and the state would be happy. While Wani may have failed in his responsibilities according to Islam and sharia, the Islamic state will ensure that wrongs will be set right by denying him custody of his own children and ensuring they are raised as Muslims.
While Ibrahim insists she was raised as a Christian by an Ethiopian Christian mother, making the ruling unfair and unjust as she never committed apostasy, a Sudanese official says Meriam was raised Muslim by a Muslim mother from a Muslim tribe and that she disappeared for several years before turning up again professing Christ and married to a Christian man.
The details, however, are totally irrelevant and must not be allowed to become a distraction. Every human being – no matter how or where they were raised and irrespective of their occupation or status – must be free to seek after God.
The debate must be about Islam’s total lack of liberty, its inherent inhumanity and its gross unreasonableness in suggesting that a good God would compel people to worship and serve him against their heart and conscience.
Elizabeth Kendal is a religious liberty analyst (Religious Liberty Monitoring), an adjunct Research Fellow at the Centre for the Study of Islam and Other Faiths at the Melbourne School of Theology, and the Director of Advocacy at Christian Faith and Freedom (Canberra). Her book, Turn Back the Battle: Isaiah Speaks to Christians Today,” was published by Deror Books in December 2012This commentary first appeared in its original form in her “Religious Liberty Monitoring of May 20.

Muslim Terrorists Crossing US/Mexican Border

Nigeria’s Boko Haram kills 28 in three village attacks

PT
Suspected Islamist Boko Haram gunmen rampaged through three villages in northern Nigeria, killing 28 people and burning houses to the ground in a pattern of violence that has become almost a daily occurrence, according to police and witnesses.
All three attacks happened on Thursday in remote parts of Borno state, the epicenter of Boko Haram’s increasingly bloody struggle for an Islamic kingdom in religiously mixed Nigeria.
One took place right next to Chibok, by the Cameroon border, from where more than 200 school girls were abducted last month.
The most deadly was in the town of Kerenua, near the Niger border. Scores of militants opened fire on residents, killing 20 of them, and burned houses, a police source said.
Since the girls’ abduction on April 14, at least 450 civilians have been killed by the group.
A spate of bombings across north and central Nigeria has killed hundreds, including two in the capital Abuja and one in the central city of Jos on Tuesday that killed 118 people.

Chilling Drug Cartel-Style Threats Hit Texas Billboards

The Blaze
EL PASO, Texas (AP) — El Paso police were investigating two mysterious messages painted onto billboards in the border city that included mannequins dressed in suits hanging from nooses.
The El Paso Times reported ( HTTP://BIT.LY/1PJVC8W ) that motorists alerted police to the graffiti early Thursday morning. Both billboard companies said the painted messages were vandalism and not paid advertisements. They have been removed.
‘We Have Never Experienced This’: Chilling Drug Cartel Style Threats on Texas Billboards
An El Paso, Texas police officer checks a makeshift mannequin Thursday, May 22, 2014, which was left hanging on a billboard along with the message, “silver or lead” in Spanish, a threat heard in Mexico signifying pay up or get shot. El Paso police were investigating two mysterious messages painted onto billboards in the border city that included mannequins dressed in suits hanging from nooses. (AP Photo/El Paso Times, Victor Calzada)
One message read “silver or lead” in Spanish, a threat heard in Mexico signifying pay up or get shot.
“This (message) has historically been used by Mexican drug cartels to threaten or intimidate Mexican citizens, business owners and government officials. However, we have never experienced this in El Paso,” Sgt. Chris Mears, a spokesman for the El Paso Police Department, said in a statement. “The investigation is ongoing, but we do not have any information to suggest this was done to target any individual person or business at this time.”
The message on the other billboard read, “dying for drugs.”
‘We Have Never Experienced This’: Chilling Drug Cartel Style Threats on Texas Billboards
An El Paso, Texas police officer checks a makeshift mannequin Thursday, May 22, 2014, which was left hanging on a billboard along with the message, “silver or lead” in Spanish, a threat heard in Mexico signifying pay up or get shot. El Paso police were investigating two mysterious messages painted onto billboards in the border city that included mannequins dressed in suits hanging from nooses. (AP Photo/El Paso Times, Victor Calzada)
Drug cartels sometimes hang banners in Mexican cities with graphic threats and have even hanged victims from overpasses, but such public threats are virtually unheard of on the U.S. side. El Paso has maintained a crime rate that is among the lowest in the country, even during recent years when Ciudad Juarez, across the border, suffered a bloody cartel battle.
“Whoever did this went through a lot of work to get this accomplished,” said Phil Jordan, a former Drug Enforcement Administration agent who ran the El Paso Intelligence Center. “This is possibly a message to someone who hasn’t cooperated with the cartels. But even if it’s a hoax, something like this is going to make the El Paso population uneasy, given that the city is not far from the killing fields of Mexico.”
We can thank our Idiot in Chief for letting the drug cartels entering our country so easily. Obama and Holder are responsible for Fast and Furious that allowed thousands of guns to be sold to drug cartels and those same guns were used to kill over 200 Mexicans and one of our border agents. But unlike the BLM and other government agencys, the border patrol isn't loaded down with high powered automatic weapons. In fact they are told that if they are fired upon or even rocks are thrown a them, they should retreat. And now our Loser in Chief wants to give amnesty to millions of these law breaking Mexicans. Isn't it time to tell Washington we have had enough and its time to close the border. Bring back our Marine. Arrest any Mexican patrols that cross into our country. enough of the acting like some banana republic that doesn't have the power to stand up to the Illegals and cartels. 

Seven Dead in Santa Barbara Drive-By Spree Killing

May 24, 2014
FromTruthAboutGuns.com


“A gunman went on a drive-by shooting rampage in a Santa Barbara student enclave and at least seven people were killed [and seven wounded], including the attacker,” foxnews.com reports. “Investigators believe a gunman driving a black BMW acted alone in the shootings late Friday night near the University of California, Santa Barbara . . . The shootings occurred at several sites in the town, resulting in nine crime scenes, including a deli where the glass window was shattered. Santa Barbara County sheriff’s spokeswoman Kelly Hoover told KEYT-TV the gunfire broke out around 9:30 p.m. Friday in the Isla Vista neighborhood . . .

  
Brown said the suspect exchanged gunfire with deputies and then drove off and crashed into a park car Deputies found the suspect inside the BMW dead from a gunshot wound to the head. The sheriff said he did not know if the suspect was shot and killed by deputies or if the wound was self-inflected. A semiautomatic handgun was recovered from the scene.
abcnews.go.com reports that

Friday, May 23, 2014

Hazmat Highway to Hell with High Pressure Gas Cylinders (No Music)

Meriam

Official ACLJ

Was Riding Horses Really Better Than Driving Cars?

Peter Schiff

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/05/brooklyn-muslim-beats-his-wife-to-death-for-not-serving-goat-for-dinner

Jihad Watch
May 22, 2014

“He comes from a culture where he thinks this is appropriate conduct, where he can hit his wife,” said defense attorney Julie Clark. “He culturally believed he had the right to hit his wife and discipline his wife.”
Not just culturally, but religiously: “Men are the managers of the affairs of women for that God has preferred in bounty one of them over another, and for that they have expended of their property. Righteous women are therefore obedient, guarding the secret for God’s guarding. And those you fear may be rebellious admonish; banish them to their couches, and beat them.” (Qur’an 4:34)
“Man killed wife for making vegetarian dinner: prosecutors,” by Josh Saul, New York Post, May 21, 2014 (thanks to Pamela Geller):
A Pakistani immigrant beat his wife to death in their Brooklyn home after she made the mistake of cooking him lentils for dinner instead of the hearty meal of goat meat that he craved, according to court papers.
Noor Hussain, 75, was so outraged over the vegetarian fare that he pummeled his wife, Nazar Hussain, 66, with a stick until she was a “bloody mess,” according to prosecutors and court papers.
“Defendant asked [his wife] to cook goat and [his wife] said she made something else,” the court papers indicated as Hussain’s murder trial opened on Wednesday.
“The conversation got louder and [his wife] disrespected defendant by cursing at defendant and saying motherf- -ker, and . . . defendant took a wooden stick and hit her with it on her arm and mouth.”
Defense attorney Julie Clark admitted Hussain beat his wife — but argued that he is guilty of only manslaughter because he didn’t intend to kill her. In Pakistan, Clark said, beating one’s wife is customary.
“He comes from a culture where he thinks this is appropriate conduct, where he can hit his wife,” Clark said in her opening statements at the Brooklyn Supreme Court bench trial. “He culturally believed he had the right to hit his wife and discipline his wife.”
Prosecutors, however, said Hussain meant for his wife to die.
“His intentions were to kill his wife,” Assistant District Attorney Sabeeha Madni said in court. “This was not a man who was trying to discipline his wife.”
Madni said that Hussain “brutally attacked his wife as she lay in her bed” — leaving deep lacerations on her head, arms and shoulders, and causing her brain to hemorrhage.
He beat her with a stick that the family had found in the street and used to stir their laundry in a washtub, the court papers state.
He then tried to clean up the blood that had splattered onto their bedroom wall before calling his son for help, Madni said.
“I killed her. Hurry up and come over,” Hussain told his son, according to prosecutors.
Madni also said Pakistani women who lived in the same building as the Hussains would testify about the beatings Nazar received at the hands of her husband.
They have told us about years of abuse they witnessed,” Madni said.
Hussain met his wife in Pakistan and the couple married before moving to Brooklyn, prosecutors said….
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/05/brooklyn-muslim-beats-his-wife-to-death-for-not-serving-goat-for-dinner